Или мне кажется, или racer научился брать информацию для автодополнения из крэйтов?

РЕШЕТО! https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/rc-is-unsafe-mostly-on-32-bit-targets-due-to-overflow/2120/17

"The 1st rule of Secret Rust Club is: you don't talk about Secret Rust Club. The 2nd rule of Secret Rust Club is: error: `1st rule` does not live long enough. error: aborting due to previous error"

Мда, в статье, где пытаются обкакать Rust рассказывают, что жыдомасонские бендеры борются против Оберона, т.е. не дают денег: http://habrahabr.ru/post/258391/

Не успел rust выйти, а уже вышел убийца rust: https://github.com/ckkashyap/rustix/issues/8 "Hi, Sorry to create an issue about this, but I'm very interested in why you decided to abandon Rust for this task and use Nim instead. Could you please tell us what are the challenges and why Rust is poorly suited to deal with them?" "Sorry ... I missed this note from you. IMO ... its not that Rust is poorly suited, its just that Nim is suited much better. I found Nim to not only satisfy the requirements for writing a kernel (which Rust also does) but also I can actually get how the whole thing works. I attribute it primarily to the fact that it generates "readable" C code as its target. I can elaborate if you are interested." "Yeah, some details would be nice! I'm considering using a modern language for systems programming and would like an opinion of experienced developer." "From a feature set point of view I believe Rust and Nim are almost at par. A couple of aspects of Nim give it an edge in my opinion. The module system of Nim is simple (in my opinion, it takes more work to make something simple). Since Nim transforms each Nim file into a corresponding C file, it's really easy to see what's happening under the hood. In case of Rust, I'd need to invest more time to understand it's module system. Since C is the target, it gives me freedom to write code for any platform I like - without having to wait for the language maintainers. (Rust targets llvm which is dependent on C++ so reaching arbitrary platforms is not going to be pleasant) This link has some more comparison data - https://github.com/andreaferretti/on-rust-and-nim You can take a look at the my xv6 source in Nim - I was able to make progress much faster in Nim."

1.0

http://blog.rust-lang.org/2015/05/15/Rust-1.0.html Все, теперь плюсцам точно капец

Какая версия собирается релизнуться со сходочками по всему миру? 1.0.0 Какая версия требуется для сборки самого важного, и даже ключевого приложения на rust? 1.1.0 https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/1588 ШТАБИЛЬНОСТЬ!

Народ уже дипломы о rust защищает: http://octarineparrot.com/assets/mrfloya-thesis-ba.pdf

TLDR про текущие треды: http://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2015/04/29/on-reference-counting-and-leaks/

Не успел релизнуться, а уже пришёл к успеху: http://scialex.github.io/reenix.pdf

"error: the trait `core::iter::Iterator` is not implemented for the type `[_; 108]`"

Исключений нет, проблемы те же: http://internals.rust-lang.org/t/disabling-panic-handling/1834

feature(libc) в бете недоступна правильно ли я понимаю, что все биндинги сосут хуй?