УМННБJ, ЯХВ. Войти !bnw Сегодня Клубы
Привет, TbI — HRWKA! 1239.1 пользователей не могут ошибаться!
?6941
прекрасное6442
говно5903
говнорашка5512
хуита4706
anime3064
linux2649
music2633
bnw2597
рашка2565
log2352
ололо2151
pic1815
дунч1808
сталирасты1491
украина1439
быдло1436
bnw_ppl1409
дыбр1238
гімно1158

Вброшу пожалуй старую стать от туомова, с которой я вполне согласен.

I think the two most important points speaking for keyboard-oriented design are

  • Extensive mouse usage tends in my personal experience to be more wearing on wrists than keyboard usage.
  • The inconvenience of switching the input device when working with textual data (such as this story or computer code and so on), and efficient access to almost all functionality.

Some people may define efficiency here terms of productivity. Fast keyboard access to all functionality they need enables them to get more work done. But I'm not one to endorse such a definition. Instead, I define an interface as efficient if it minimises the time I have to spend interacting with it – and in the long-term, no less. I think keyboard-orientedness as outlined above best provides such efficiency in most applications.

http://tuomov.bitcheese.net/b/archives/2006/02/12/T21_08_50

#OEK8PL (1) / @ninesigns / 3910 дней назад
ipv6 ready BnW для ведрофона BnW на Реформале Викивач Котятки

Цоперайт © 2010-2016 @stiletto.